rabbit  ·  a human research studio  ·  est. 2026


the world is drowning in answers that sound right. the rare thing now is a named human who read the source, all of it, and will stand behind every claim.

rabbit picks one question, digs it to the bottom, and leaves the tunnel open so you can watch the whole descent.

depth 0.0 m layer surface you are here

01 topsoil · why we dig

a machine can fetch.
it cannot vouch.

software can surface ten thousand pages in a minute. it cannot promise that a single one of them says what it seems to say. so every trail ends the old way: a person reads the originals, all of them, keeps the source log as they go, and signs the reading.

the ai-authored count is printed on every trail. it is always zero. that number is the whole point.

the trail

what we found

one question dug to the bottom, every claim cited, laid out so the descent is as readable as the answer. the head.

the carrot

why we dig

a short letter from someone exceptional about a question they cannot stop thinking about. the heart, and the bench we grow diggers from.

› if the animal rule connects to orphan drugs, does it connect to the pediatric voucher too? · dig no. 004

02 the seam · four things we bring back up

what a dig
yields.

every trail leaves the same four things at the surface: the finding, the evidence behind it, the letter that started it, and the count that keeps us honest.

the trail

a marked path back to the surface, one crumb at a time, so anyone can walk the dig in reverse.

follow it ›

the source log

every document opened, in order, with the one live thread that carries the finding shown in red.

read it ›

the carrot

the letter that started the whole thing: one person, one question they could not put down.

taste it ›

zero ai-authored

the count of claims a machine wrote. it escapes as particles, but the number that stays is zero.

why ›

03 the descent · the method

seven steps
to the bottom.

the method is the product. it stays public on purpose, so anyone can check that a trail was dug the way it claims.

01−2 m

pick the hole

one specific, answerable question, chosen where a committed human goes deeper than a generalist with a model and an afternoon.

02−28 m

dig

the tools drag the whole archive into the light: every paper, patent, dataset, and buried page that might matter. then a human sits down and reads.

03−61 m

verify

every claim traces to a primary source with a page number. no "studies show." a source you have not personally read is not a source yet.

04−97 m

keep the pen human

nothing that ships was written by a machine. the synthesis is one person's work, and they stake their name on it.

05−140 m

know when it is done

a trail ends when you hit a source you cannot go past, or you surface something nobody else has. it does not end when you get tired.

06−181 m

show the descent

watching the dig is half the value. we leave the tunnel open behind us, source log and all, so the work is checkable and not just believable.

07−214 m

stay on the line

ideas, science, technology, institutions, history. never private individuals. no doxxing, no surveillance. the line is fixed on day one.

› quinzel dug down this one for six hours and came back with a single footnote. worth it.

04 bedrock · the find

this is what
the bottom looks like.

a trail is a specimen. it surfaces into the light as paper, signed, stamped, and traceable line by line. what follows is a demonstration specimen, drawn from real statute, to show the shape of a finished dig.

trail № 000 · demonstration

does the fda's rulebook for animal drugs hide a shortcut for our rarest human medicines?

a human drug can, in narrow cases, win approval on animal efficacy data 21 cfr 314.600–650 (the "animal rule") · fda · §314.610 alone, when a human efficacy trial would be neither ethical nor feasible. the question this trail digs: where does that seam actually connect to the orphan-drug incentive structure orphan drug act, 21 usc §360aa–360ff · designation criteria, and where does everyone assume it connects but it does not?

depth ▁▂▃▄▅▆▇█  reached bedrock, −214 m
sources  2 statutes shown  ·  0 ai-authored
status  demonstration · full trails carry a live source log, checkable line by line
› follow §314.610 down to the document it stands on
carrot № 000 · the heart
the question i cannot put down is a small one. why did a system built to protect us end up rewarding the thing it was meant to prevent, and who noticed first?
a friend of the burrow · the letter that opens every trail

05 the two rules · non-negotiable

two lines we
do not cross.

the ai rule

tools may search, sort, and fetch. they do not conclude. a bottom line written by a machine is not a finding — it is an echo.

the ethics line

we dig into ideas, science, technology, institutions, and history. never into private individuals. no doxxing, no surveillance. this protects the whole thing.

06 the burrow · your turn

found a hole
worth digging?

send the question you cannot stop thinking about. if it has a bottom, and a human can reach it better than a model can, we will dig it.

your question may be dug in public; your name and email never are. the email is used once, to reply, then left alone. no lists, no tracking, no third parties.

signed, the burrow

the story in a digger's hand · the notes in spectral · the evidence in ibm plex mono
the hand tells the story. the mono holds the proof. the two never mix inside a claim.
0 ai-authored · est. 2026 · back to the surface ↑
reach the warren info@e0labs.com · sz3438@columbia.edu